DOJ 'Anti-Weaponization' Fund and Trump Slush Fund Controversy
The Trump administration's establishment of a $1.8 billion 'Anti-Weaponization' fund to compensate people it claimed were unfairly prosecuted by the Biden-era DOJ — widely denounced as a political slush fund. Created in May 2026, challenged in courts, and ultimately withdrawn after federal judges blocked payouts. Subsequent revelations alleged FBI Director Kash Patel directed funds to a separate slush fund, and the underlying $1.8 billion IRS settlement was later voided by a federal court.
Get notified of new events in this story thread
Use the search function to find specific events within a story thread.
Jump to a month:
The Trump administration was considering a $1.7 billion fund to compensate political allies investigated under the Biden administration, a proposal critics described as an unusual political slush fund financed by taxpayers.
Trump reportedly may settle his lawsuit against the IRS for a $1.7 billion fund to compensate himself and his allies, which would involve the use of billions of taxpayer dollars in what critics describe as an unprecedented self-dealing maneuver.
The Department of Justice established a $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund to compensate people it claims were wronged by the federal government, a group that could largely consist of Trump allies including January 6 rioters. Democratic lawmakers criticized the fund as raising 'the specter of corruption unparalleled'.
The Department of Justice and Trump administration reached a settlement that dismisses a $10 billion IRS lawsuit and creates a $1.7 billion 'anti-weaponization fund' to compensate Trump's political allies. As part of the deal, the IRS is permanently barred from auditing Trump's past tax returns and pursuing a separate ~$100 million penalty involving the Trump Organization's claimed losses.
Senate Republicans blocked an amendment by Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) that would have barred the Trump administration from creating the anti-weaponization compensation fund for Trump's allies.
Retired Capitol and DC police officers filed a lawsuit alleging that Trump's $1.8 billion fund to support January 6 rioters and allies constitutes unlawful presidential corruption. The suit challenges the legal mechanisms that allow the fund to operate.
Trump and top officials defended an $1.8 billion fund announced this week with inaccurate claims. A lawsuit argues the fund excludes individuals and groups who suffered partisan attacks by the federal government under Trump and would not be eligible for compensation.
A bipartisan group of former federal judges asked a federal court to reopen President Trump's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service and challenged his $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, arguing it was a 'fraud on the court' that would funnel taxpayer dollars to Trump allies including January 6 rioters.
A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from making payouts from a $1.776 billion settlement fund for the president's allies who claim they were victims of government weaponization. The judge blocked any transfers in or out of the fund pending further legal arguments in June.
A federal judge halted the Trump administration's nearly $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' settlement fund, ordering the government to stop further action while a case challenging the fund's legality proceeds. Capitol riot convicts have been seeking payouts from the fund.
Trump withdrew his controversial $1.8 billion 'weaponization' fund, which was designed to compensate alleged victims of prosecutorial misconduct under Biden but drew criticism as a political slush fund to reward allies.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed that Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund will not proceed, citing fierce backlash and court setbacks. However, Blanche said an order shielding Trump and his family from IRS audits will remain in place.
Senate Republicans introduced a revised immigration enforcement funding bill and expressed concerns about a proposed "anti-weaponization fund" that would allow the president to pay people claiming to be victims of government persecution. The Senate voted 53-46 to advance the measure.
The Trump administration announced it will drop the $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund intended to provide financial settlements to people claiming political persecution, following Republican party dissent over the plan.
Trump refused to rule out using a newly established 'anti-weaponization' fund to compensate Capitol rioters who attacked police on January 6, saying he would 'pay the kind of money they deserve' during the Meet the Press interview.
A federal judge in Virginia extended a court-ordered block on the Trump administration's $1.8 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund,' which was created to compensate alleged victims of a weaponized government. The ruling prevents the administration from operating the settlement fund.
Congressman Jamie Raskin alleged that FBI Director Kash Patel directed approximately $1 million to a 'slush fund' to pay bonuses to loyalist agents in his inner circle, raising concerns about inappropriate use of government funds.
A federal judge voided President Trump's $1.8 billion settlement with the IRS that had granted him immunity from tax audits. Judge Kathleen Williams ruled the lawsuit was filed for 'improper purposes' and referred Trump's attorneys, including acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, for potential disciplinary action.
Todd Blanche's nomination as attorney general faced setbacks when two Republican senators pressed for written commitments to kill Trump's controversial "anti-weaponization" fund. Blanche's path to confirmation also faced opposition from Epstein survivors and concerns over his previous representation of Trump.
Trump threatened to withdraw Todd Blanche's nomination as attorney general unless two Republican holdout senators—John Cornyn and Thom Tillis—leave office, over their demands for written guarantees that the controversial $1.8 billion DOJ 'anti-weaponization' fund be terminated.
A federal judge ruled that Trump's $10 billion IRS lawsuit was brought in bad faith to 'manipulate' legal proceedings, finding no basis 'in law or fact' for the settlement. Trump appealed the ruling on Friday, continuing his fight to preserve the deal that granted him tax immunity and underpins the controversial $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund that is blocking Todd Blanche's attorney general confirmation.
Trump defended his controversial $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, calling for immediate confirmation of Todd Blanche as attorney general despite Republican senators Thom Tillis, John Cornyn, and Bill Cassidy opposing the nomination. Trump's public defense of the fund—which a federal judge found to lack any legal or factual basis—further complicated Blanche's path to confirmation.
Trump vowed to resurrect the $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund and keep Todd Blanche as acting Attorney General if Senate Republicans fail to confirm him, escalating conflict with GOP senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis. Both senators said they would not support Blanche's nomination.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche formally rescinded the controversial $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization fund' after reaching a deal with two Republican holdout senators (John Cornyn and Thom Tillis). Critics raised concerns about loopholes in the agreement that could allow Trump to revive the fund, as it requires only mutual agreement between Trump and his administration to modify.
Todd Blanche's nomination for Attorney General advanced out of the Senate Judiciary Committee on a 12-10 party-line vote after he formally rescinded Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund that had been designed to compensate political allies, addressing concerns from Republican Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis.
26 events in this story · Browse all stories · Back to top ↑